Closing DAPL would result in more oil having to be transported by rail and road, resulting in a loss of approximately $46 million per year in the value of North Dakota’s highway system.Due to the resulting disruption to long-term oil exploration, production and transportation, DAPL’s closure would mean the permanent loss of an estimated 2,000 to 3,000 jobs in North Dakota. This would result in an estimated immediate loss of 600 to 750 full-time positions. The estimated regional economic impact of DAPL’s closure would be over $1.6 billion per year in increased production costs and lost production.It would provide North Dakota taxpayers with an estimated $375 million per year in direct oil tax revenues, $23 million in interest costs to the Bank of North Dakota (BND), $30 million per year in trust lands- revenue and $102 million in annual losses to the state’s Legacy Fund and $3 million in lost profits to the state-owned North Dakota Mill. Closing DAPL would cost the state $1.2 billion in the first year and $116 million annually thereafter.The comments warn that closing DAPL would “cause unnecessary and irreparable harm to North Dakota,” including the following impacts: Therefore, the State of North Dakota urges the Corps to stick to the facts, do what is right for national security, and choose continued operation of the DAPL at its current location as the only right and reasonable alternative.” “It is absurd that of the more than 18,000 pipeline water crossings in the United States, the Corps continues to focus on one of the most advanced crossings in the country. “These comments submitted reinforce that the safest, most efficient and environmentally friendly means of transporting all liquids is by pipeline – especially when that pipeline already exists and has been operating safely for over six years,” Burgum said. The comments represent three months of extensive collaboration involving more than 10 executive agencies and five independently elected statewide officials, Burgum noted. It plays a critical role in ensuring energy security and affordability for the entire country, while having a tremendous positive economic impact that impacts every North Dakotan.” “DAPL is an essential part of North Dakota’s and the nation’s energy infrastructure. “We call on the Corps to follow the law, facts, science and common sense and put an end to this lengthy, unnecessary and highly politicized process,” Burgum said in his cover letter. North Dakota’s comments urge the Corps to recommend Alternative 3, which will allow DAPL to continue operating safely as it has for over six years. Three of the five alternatives considered in the draft EIS would effectively force DAPL to close, which Burgum said would cause unacceptable economic and environmental damage to the state. North Dakota commented on the Corps’ draft environmental impact statement (EIS) on the easement for the existing DAPL crossing 93 feet below the bottom of Lake Oahe. to maintain its current route and continue to transport safe crude oil from North Dakota, as it has done for more than six years. Army Corps of Engineers approved the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) should allow. Doug Burgum on Wednesday led a contingent of North Dakota state officials and agencies in submitting over 200 pages of official comments and supporting materials explaining why the U.S. Ryckman says the department is starting in the South Eastern portion, and going counter clockwise around the state.Ī full list of collection sites, how to safely place the heads at those locations, and self sampling kits can be found by clicking here.BISMARCK, N.D. Instead of dividing the state into three pieces and conducting investigations in one of those pieces and in known positive units, staff are now breaking the state into four observation areas and investigating one area per year. Ryckman says the Game and Fish Department is slightly changing how they collect data on CWD this year. Once we get a larger sample size, it helps us get a better inference on the disease in that area," said Ryckman. "By submitting your heads it gives us an opportunity to boost our sample size. These samples are collected by wildlife biologists like Mason Ryckman, who then let hunters know if their deer is infected with CWD. The North Dakota Game and Fish Department is currently taking samples from the Hunter-Harvested Surveillance program in several units across the state (2A, 2B, 2F2, 2G1, 2G2, 2H, 2I, and 2J2). (Bismarck, ND) - North Dakota wildlife officials are encouraging hunters to bring deer heads in for testing of Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |